Jump to content
HomepageAbout missionsStrong collaboration skills are a must

Conferences are ideal for interdisciplinarity

There are fewer prestigious publishing channels for interdisciplinary research, and building new practices takes time. From the start of the projects, both have contributed to reducing expectations for publishing results from the interdisciplinary research projects compared to expectations for monodisciplinary research.

Conferences are ideal for interdisciplinarity

There are fewer prestigious publishing channels for interdisciplinary research, and building new practices takes time. From the start of the projects, both have contributed to reducing expectations for publishing results from the interdisciplinary research projects compared to expectations for monodisciplinary research.

In the project period 2018-2021, a total of 127 publications have been registered, which are associated with one of the five interdisciplinary projects. A large majority of the researchers who have participated in the projects also state that they have published research results that can be attributed to the interdisciplinary research project in peer-reviewed journals, books or conference proceedings. In addition, more than half and several of the PhD students in the study have written together with project partners from other faculties than the one they are employed at.

Some researchers express that the projects collaborated across disciplines in relation to the development of new knowledge, but that this knowledge in wide extent was reported monodisciplinary. This is explained, among other things, by the fact that the scientific environments still largely operate in silos, and therefore they still work within academic "boxes" when communicating what has been done in terms of research.

Many of us publish extensively in what might be called interdisciplinary journals and conferences, and the point is surely that we should all do both, both the interdisciplinary and the monodisciplinary, and let the two approaches fertilise each other

Kirsten Gram-Hanssen, Project Manager for InterHUB

However, there are also project participants who express that articles have been published in journals that would not otherwise have been considered if they had not worked interdisciplinary work.

Unproblematic to publish at interdisciplinary conferences
Despite efforts to publish across disciplinary boundaries, in some cases these had to be abandoned because the disciplines were found to be too far apart. Challenges regarding time have also been explicit in relation to publishing, where some experienced that it was too time demanding writing with researchers who are academically far away from one's own field. Once interdisciplinary research has been successfully published, it is not considered likely that it will be recognised within the various (mono-)disciplinary fields of study. However, the project participants also point out that it has been unproblematic to present the results at interdisciplinary conferences.

The difficulty of publishing interdisciplinary research is, among other things, about balancing breadth and depth – and can be difficult to sell to publishers. This is confirmed by Project Manager for SECURE, Rafael Wisniewski:

It is still very difficult to disseminate the results of interdisciplinary projects, as the journals and conferences want to see excellence, which is inevitably related to very narrow and deep research studies

Rafael Wisniewski, Project Manager for SECURE

However Project Manager for InterHUB, Kirsten Gram-Hanssen, believes that interdisciplinary publishing is already well underway:

Many of us publish extensively in what might be called interdisciplinary journals and conferences, and the point is that we should all do both, both the interdisciplinary and the monodisciplinary, and let the two approaches fertilise each other

Kirsten Gram-Hanssen, Project Manager for InterHUB

Publications from the five projects by type

  • 19% Conference contribution (incl. conference abstracts)
  • 43% Journal articles
  • 20% Books, incl. anthologies and book contributions
  • 18% Other

BROADER PERSPECTIVE ON OWN FIELD

Cross-discipline collaboration has for some project participants been a productive way of expanding one's own discipline and discover overlapping interests with other disciplines. Method exchange and learning in relation to how the different disciplinary fields view the same issues in different ways, but where it still succeeds in finding a common language, are also mentioned as learning elements. Furthermore, it has provided a broader perspective on own research and a greater insight into which areas own research is relevant to.

Developed ability to explain own research

The researchers in the interdisciplinary projects also emphasise strengthened skillls to work across disciplines and communicate more explicitly with colleagues from other fields as a benefit of project participation. For example, one explains that project work has developed their ability to explain to others what they do and how it can be useful, which is an important learning experience when you spend the vast majority of your work hours with people who have the same disciplinary background as oneself.

In Community Drive, we at the Department of Communication, collaborated among others with the Department of Electronic Systems. As a result, open data research became part of our experiments with young people in schools. We would not have thought of entering the field of open data ourselves, but it provided a whole new data perspective in the collaborative processes between young people and the municipality that we studied. Today, we are part of a large Marie Curie EU project with PhDs in open data in eight countries in the EU. It is a direct offshoot of the research from Community Drive

Rikke Magnussen, Project Manager for Community Drive